Case Studies > Gas
Utilization Plant
Location Confidential
A gas utilisation plant inclusive various mechanical
and electrical installations, piping and instrumentation, power and power
distribution, control systems and associated building and civil works.
The contract was awarded by a general contractor (the Employer) to a
consortium (the Consortium) of which our Client was consortium leader,
responsible for the overall basic design of the plant and the procurement,
delivery and erection of the mechanical and electrical installations.
KEY FEATURES
The contract was awarded on a fixed-price, lump-sum, turnkey basis utilizing
the Employer's hybrid form of design and build contract. Our client took the
view, subsequent to contract award, that the General Conditions of Contract
contained unacceptable items and levels of commercial risk. They concluded
that a policy and strategy had to be developed to effectively manage such risks
as they were in no position to renegotiate the terms and conditions with the
Employer, nor was the Employer willing to accept any risk transfer as a matter
of policy. They also concluded that they should develop a proactive approach
to opportunities for additional financial recovery in light of the Employer’s
non – negotiable stance in regard to the high value and propensity level
of risks.
CONSULTANCY SERVICES - Commercial
and Contractual Management and Administration - Claims Management
As a result of our Client’s perceptions on real and potential areas of
risk, Lancaster House International Consulting were requested to initially
assist with the development of the aforementioned policy and strategy paper
for risk management in our Client’s head office in Germany. Upon completion
of this exercise, (after some two to three months during which time we also
had to advise on a few critical commercial / contractual issues), we then transferred
to their project field offices in North Africa for a period of two years to
undertake commercial and contractual management and administration duties responsible
to the project manager and head office corporate management. In this capacity,
we were required to act as “front line” claims managers, dealing
entirely with minor claims issues on a monthly basis and providing the groundwork
records for the development of substantial and complex claims back in head
office.
Initially, we undertook a complete review of the main
contract documentation, the consortium agreement and other relevant contractual
documents. During this exercise, we identified a number of latent risks
additional to those which had been earmarked by our Client and included
them within the initial policy and strategy paper for proactive risk
management A detailed commercial policy and strategy paper was then prepared,
discussed and agreed with head office management and project management.
The main matters addressed were in respect of the contract programme
for completion, the contract price, penalties for late completion, works
progress and other payment provisions, contract variations and obtaining
early reimbursement thereof, contractual claims procedures, and dispute
resolution procedures.
We made a comprehensive range of recommendations for
the introduction of specific commercial and contractual management and
administration tools and procedures for the management of key risk areas
most of which we adopted and put into good and effective practice. We
believe the integration of some of our Best Practice Procedures into
our Client’s commercial systems, allied to the project manager’s
appreciation of our methods, led to an excellent and highly effective
working relationship. The conclusive result of this integration and partnering
spirit was one of the main factors resulting in the project becoming
a commercial success. Indeed, it was completed well within time and budget
and without materialization of any of the significant risks highlighted
in the original paper. |